Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Electrofag - sale now on!

All posts are being cross-posted here while this blog prepares to close down. This one will eventually remain as an archive only.

It's not really time for an Electrofag update. I thought I'd drop those to once a month to make the cost comparisons worthwhile but I've just found out that the supplier I use has a sale on until December 17th. 30% off most of the stuff there.

Here's the three-month comparison, summarised as:

Electrofag essentials £102.32

Semi-essentials (bought already but not necessary) £49.16

Totally unnecessary but fun gadgets £37.56

Real tobacco £112.50

That was only two weeks ago. From that, it seemed that my approach of roughly half real tobacco and half Electrofag would take three months to reach parity in costs, after which Electrofag would start to look cheaper.

It's true. Electrofag has incurred no further costs in the past fortnight while real tobacco has. I haven't even burned out one of the heating elements yet even though they are long past their guaranteed lifespan. Although it's a little skewed because of the severe cold outside which means that at the lab, I make much more use of Electrofag than I would if the weather was mild. At home, real tobacco use is higher but even so, I can make a half-ounce last more than two days now.

The supplier claims a 90% reduction in smoking costs over a year. My own experience suggests I would have had roughly 50% reduction in costs over three months if I had gone completely over to Electrofag, but I still like the real ones too much to do that. Going fully electronic could certainly cut the cost by 90% over a year, I'd say. I'm now in the reduced-cost stage even with still buying real smokes. I'd go over totally to Electrofag if it develops to the point where it's exactly like the real thing (but without the tar and other chemicals) but as it stands, it's not quite there yet. It's miles ahead of patches and gum though.

Then again, there's a sale on and it's a sale of little electronic gadgets, therefore I'm going to put up the gadgetry costs of Electrofag now. This is entirely non-essential stuff. It's just toys. Here's the additional stuff:

5ml banana flavour juice (have to try that one!) £2.79
10 ml flavour concentrate - roast chicken. Yes, really! £2.79
5 ml unflavoured juice in super-high strength £2.79. I already have some of this but it's earmarked for an experiment. It's double the strength I normally prefer so I've also bought another bottle of propylene glycol to dilute it - another £2.79.

Even though the five batteries I have still work well, I've taken the opportunity to buy a five-pack of spares at 30% discount - £24.99. Not essential yet but rechargeable batteries don't last forever.

And... I've been putting this one off because it's only available in super strength and 30 ml bottles but since it's reduced, I have to. Absinthe flavour! I can dilute it if it's too powerful.

So that'll add £53.73 (£1.99 postage) to the Electrofag gadget additions. Sounds a lot but what the hell. If there were gadgets for real fags I'd buy those too.

So if you pass someone in the street smoking a black cigarette that lights up blue, and you get a whiff of roast chicken, absinthe or banana as you pass, and if he's cackling like a madman, it's probably me. Smoking a chicken.

The essential costs haven't changed. This is all gadget money, so if I were using Electrofag frugally and just buying essentials, it would now be ahead on costs. But then, cost isn't the primary motivator.

The principle reason I bought Electrofag was to be able to 'smoke' in some form when I'm away from home and it's too horrible to go outside. Also when visiting a hospital or some other Centre of Righteousness where they won't even let you smoke in the grounds. They're happy to give you all manner of deadly diseases that will kill you now, but they won't let you indulge something that might - or might not - kill you decades in the future. You're not allowed to harm yourself on hospital premises. That's their job.

I wasn't sure if I'd persist with it because while it's a reasonable semblance of smoking, it's not the same. Advantages are many, yes, including a complete absence of ash and the fact that you don't need to carry a bulky pack or tobacco or a lighter. You can also take a couple of puffs and drop it back into your pocket or sit and smoke for an hour.

The downside is mainly that it's too heavy to be real. The 'tobacco' flavour isn't like the real thing, although the 'virginia' flavour is pretty close (for me, anyway). It's not a full replacement yet but given time and development it could get there.

I think I persist with it because it's just so much fun. I already have cigar flavour, coffee, menthol, virginia, tobacco and French pipe. I still get a kick out of the look on people's faces when I puff on what appears to be a pen, it lights up blue and 'smoke' comes out. So far I have never been approached by security anywhere and told to stop smoking. I'm actively trying for that one because I want to see their faces when I drop what they think is a lit cigarette into my shirt pocket. And, of course, it has enormous gadget value. Plus it is totally and absolutely harmless to any non-smoker so they have absolutely nothing to complain about. Not that that will ever stop the more dedicated of them.

ASH (The Association of Spite and Hate) want to ban Electrofag too. They claim that if you stand beside an Electrofagger, the amount of nicotine in the steam that comes out will give you a heart attack. You are not to consider, for a moment, why the Electrofagger is standing perfectly healthily while you, exposed to far, far less than he, are expected to drop dead on the spot.

You, antismoker, are not to think about the patches and gum endorsed by ASH, about the nicotine content of those things, nor are you to connect the idea that the trace of nicotine you might experience (and which is going to kill you right now) is barely detectable compared to the amount of nicotine in the patches ASH want people to stick on themselves and which they say will, paradoxically, save their lives.

If ASH promote dosing people with far higher levels of nicotine than they attribute to a heart attack, why are they not already being investigated for attempted murder? The intent is definitely there. They believe a tiny amount will kill and they insist people attach far higher levels to themselves. In their own minds, they are deliberately setting out to poison people. That cannot logically be seen as anything other than a deliberate attempt to kill.

You non-smokers must never, ever find out that there is more nicotine in a tomato than in the residual steam from an Electrofag. You must wipe from your mind all that previous talk of tar, benzene, formaldehyde and carcinogenic particulates in cigarette smoke because none of those exist in Electrofag. You must believe that it's the nicotine, only the nicotine and always has been only the nicotine.

You are at war with nicotine. You have always been at war with nicotine.

You have never complained about the smell. Only the nicotine. You have never complained about the smoke. Only the nicotine. You have never worried about tar or formaldehyde or benzene or particulates. Only the nicotine.

You have never worried about lung cancer. You have always been concerned about spontaneous heart attacks. No lung cancer. Heart attacks. Keep saying it over and over until you believe it.

And when you do, we smokers are going to sue every doctor, every producer and promoter of nicotine patches and gum and every shop selling them for attempted murder. Because ASH has declared that much tinier levels of nicotine are deadly, and you'll all believe it. Therefore deliberately persuading people to attach high levels to their skin or put it in their mouths is a clear and unequivocal intent to kill.

The best part is, those people ASH convinced will be there, on the jury. Unless they're smokers. Which won't help.

I say, let ASH push this new line of lies. Let them convince all their drones.

Then prosecute.

Life can be fun. I think I'll take a smoke break now.
wordpress blog stats


( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
14th Dec, 2009 01:32 (UTC)
I was travelling back home from Majorca (or was it the other way round? - Not sure.),and the cabin supervisor said that, not only was actual smoking not allowed, but electronic cigarettes were not allowed.

This announcement made me think. I thought, "Why has this person (cabin supervisor) said that?" The obvious answer is that there is no actual health or safety reason for banning electronic cigarettes at all, but cabin staff may be inconvenienced by having to ensure that these electronic cigs are not real cigs. So the banning of electronic cigs is simply and wholly for the convenience of cabin staff.

Obviously, I wondered what would happen if a passenger ignored that ban. It is tempting to buy an electronic cigarette pack simply to see what would happen if one 'sparked up' (literally!) on an aircraft. But I am too poor to take the risk of testing it out.

But this incident raises a deeper question. I am sure that we are all familiar with announcements of aircraft cabin staff that only alcohol purchased on the aircraft may be consumed while on the aircraft. Erm....why, precisely, should I not consume alcohol which is mine as and when I wish? Is it not my human right to do what I wish provided that it harms no other person? Arbitrary bans are no longer acceptable. The mere fact that, occasionally, some dickhead goes over the top and gets pissed on vodka that she bought in the airport and took onto the aircraft does not allow the carrier to deny us our human rights.

If I was a wealthy person, I would take great delight in doing everything that these bossy-boots say that I am not allowed to. Not only that, but I would also ensure, as part of the fun, that the the incident was filmed and broadcast in the media.

What is the matter with these wealthy people that when they do have an altercation with cabin crew, they always fuck it up?

14th Dec, 2009 20:37 (UTC)
I would consider draping a dark coloured plaid handkerchief over my head and advising next to me that it is to keep out environmental causes of migraine headache, thus medically advised.

Then I would consider holding the electro-fag up to my mouth like a soda straw underneath the cloth and inhaling as often as I pleased.

Should next to me raise questions, claim I am using a detoxifying asthma inhaler under strict medical advice to ward off asthma attacks caused by the evil recirculated air inside aeroplane cabins and without doing so I would die on the spot.

Having evaded my seat mate's curiosity, I would then proceed to draw on the electro-fag in order to cure what ails me as there is no longer reason for alarm.

Upon leaving the aircraft upon arrival, I might discreetly leave some juicy piles of spittal behind in obvious places, including the seat I was sitting in, so the arse-tight little cabin steward can find something to truly complain about and keep him busy as he is paid to do instead of harassing good paying customers by way of his tin-hat authority moniker.

Barring that, I would consider making multiple trips to the cabin restroom or just locking myself inside for the duration of the flight and e-fagging in there to my heart's delight. If all restrooms are taken over by e-faggers, then too bad for the rest of the non-smoking bigots who will have to figure out a way to relieve themselves.

Of course I probably never would tempt reprisal upon myself by doing all of the above methods, but it seems like things of that sort are probably possible. After all, there are mile-high clubs of those who have done far more than e-fagging in full public view while in flight.

ASH is such a corrupt parasitical blight on society, I truly do hope I live to see the day they are hauled into court on both sides of the Atlantic and put through the wringers and made insolvent, including jail-time for the ring-leader(s).

( 2 comments — Leave a comment )