Home

Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry

legiron2

As Labour have recently admitted, their unlimited and unmonitored immigration policy, coupled with the provision of any and all benefits to those immigrants who don't want to integrate or work (coupled with severe restrictions on those who do) was deliberately done as a nose-thumbing exercise to the Tories and to force their bizarre multiculturalism agenda on the population. It was deliberate. The indigenous were duped, lied to and shouted down as racist-Nazi-bigots for objecting. The immigrants who thought they were invited to Dick Whittington's London, where the streets were paved with gold, were duped, lied to and herded into enclaves of Labour-voting dependent pets.

They set indigenous against immigrant at every opportunity even though all of us, of all colours, of all religions and none, didn't, on the whole, care much about the differences. They encouraged and exaggerated those differences  and laughed at the spectacle of our conflict while reaping the rewards of the boom-time tax intakes. While the money and the credit flowed like urine down an over-excited Prime Minister's leg, they could afford all the dependent voters they could find.

Nobody noticed the second homes remodelled to look like the palace of Versailles because we could all get credit. We could all have TV sets so large we had to sit in the garden to watch them. We could all have the playstations and the Xboxes and the blackberry phones and the DVD recorders and the sky-plus things so we could record enough televised shite to torture those Guantamano inmates for a century. We could all drive Scorpion tanks (disarmed, of course) at five miles to the gallon, fitted with satellite navigation to find our way to the Sainsbury we'd shopped at every week for ten years, we could have the heat on in summer just for show, we could do anything on credit. So could the government and if you think your next-door neighbour's sequinned pergola was an unneccessary extravagance, look at what your government did.

This country now owes more money than exists. It cannot be paid back. It simply cannot be done. Yet this government keeps spending and we cannot even pay the monthly interest on what we owe.

Those Righteous who have so fervently trumpeted their 'Racist! How dare you demand they learn the language of the country they've moved to?' and other assorted bile and vitriol, now find they can't afford to keep their pets any more.

So now, Alan Johnson, champion of the latest 'Whack-a-Dissenter' event, has declared that Labour's immigration policies were mistaken.

Step away from the stable door, Mr, Johnson. That horse bolted days ago. Those policies were in no way the result of mistakes. They were deliberate. You bought in those votes and now you can't pay for them so you wish to consign your pets to the Battersea Immigrant's Home. The bad news is, there is no such place. So what do you have in mind? The House of 1000 Immigrants? Reservoir Serbians? Perhaps those perennial favourites, a walk in the woods or the mysterious door in the wall of the fiftieth floor labelled 'Exit'?

In his first speech on the subject, Mr Johnson said some parts of the country have been "disproportionately affected" by the influx of migrants and said his predecessors had ignored for "far too long" problems in the system that led to huge backlogs of asylum seekers and foreign national prisoners.

You did not ignore those problems You caused them. Deliberately. Those people were playthings to you. It was all a schoolyard Tory-baiting game. You and the rest of your party, along with your weak and feeble footsoldiers, gave not a moment's thought to the real lives of real people, indigenous or immigrant. The country, to you, is a big game of 'Risk' and you have lost that game. We, the counters on the board, are the ones who take the brunt. While you play games with your Tory opponents, real lives are wiped off the board with Cillit Bang efficiency.

"The legacy problems with unreturned foreign national prisoners and asylum seekers may have accumulated under previous administrations, but they continued to be ignored for far too long on our watch."

Blame Thatcher. Well, why not blame Cromwell? How about blaming Henry III? Wiliam of Orange? King Cnut? King Arthur? Vortigern? Augustus Caesar? Rameses II? Bob the Druid or even Ugg, that crazed madman who invented the wheel despite all the advice that it would just lead to trouble. He really should have listened.

Labour have had nearly thirteen years to 'do something' about immigration and they have done quite a lot about it. They have made it a hundred times worse and slapped down anyone who dares question it, with their war-cry of 'Racist Nazi Bigot'. They have, as we have seen, done this perfectly deliberately and with malice aforethought. Labour have not ignored these problems. They have rocked themselves to sleep with unmitigated glee at their vicious and despicable manipulation of both indigenous and immigrant. It's just a game. The proles aren't real people. Not like the Party members. Prole lives are expendable.

Now this Johnson creature comes up with the notion that 'immigrants are causing problems'. I disagree. Immigrants, criminal and shiftless ones rather than the productive and intergrating variety, might be problems but those problems did not cause themselves. Labour caused those problems. It was no accident. It was not incompetence. it was nothing to do with previous administrations, it was this one.

It's too late to shift the blame. It's too late to pretend Labour have not shouted down any and all discussion of immigration for over a decade because, Mr, Johnson, you are not dealing with goldfish here. We have memories. We have the ability to remember what happened yesterday and the day before. We know about the 'racist-Nazi-bigot' game because we have all been on the receiving end of it.

We are still getting that same cry from your drones because those you have twisted to your thoughts are stupid, by default. They have not realised that the tune has changed yet. They still bawl out 'racist' at anyone who says as much as 'Well, there are a few too many immigrants here'. They do not yet realise that you have turned on the Muslims you nurtured and encouraged into extremism. They have not seen where your new 'controlled immigration' is going. They do not understand that it is all, as is everything the Socialists ever do, about money. All they ever think about is money, and how they can get hold of it without bothering with any of that evil capitalist 'work' business.

It's not going to work, Johnson. Time's up. The game is over for you.

For us, I suspect it will continue as usual because we have the next Blair coming along to start the same process all over again. They even have that broken referendum promise to start them off.
wordpress blog stats

Comments

( 18 comments — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous) wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 05:38 (UTC)
internal passport
Alan ' Tired & Emotionl ' Johnson is being economical with l'actualité in misusing the word 'maladroit' to describe Labours program of ethnic swamping. What he might have said was " we lied and cheated to divide and rule the rump working classes but made sure Middle England would not get too upset by dumping the immigrants in shit-holes where M.E. do not live with the additional advantage of allowing M.E. to feel smug and superior by lecturing the working classes about how lucky they were to be celebrating Cultural Diversity on their own doosteps ( but not ours )."

Mr Johnson recognises the problems created by immigrants concentrating in particular areas. Perhaps he might be thinking of solving this problem by moving them around a bit to ensure 'fairness' with a more equable distribution; resettlement, internal passports, that kind of thing, Oo look, Englands Euro Regions, how very handy.
[info]leg_iron wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 22:22 (UTC)
Re: internal passport
Labour can't afford to bribe their voters any more. I expect they'll try to get rid of them next, or force them into work.

They'll be up against the entitlement society they invented themselves. Get the popcorn, this could be fun.
(Anonymous) wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 08:58 (UTC)
Tories
I've only ever voted Tory. They've lost my vote. My choices are now UKIP or Libertarians.

Sue
http://muffledvociferation.blogspot.com/
[info]leg_iron wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 22:31 (UTC)
Re: Tories
Not enough Libertarian candidates yet. If there was one here, I'd vote for them. I'd canvass for them too.

UKIP I'm no longer sure about, now they've moved to the 'well, we can stay in the EU and fix it' mode. Still on the choice list though, way above the main parties.
(Anonymous) wrote:
4th Nov, 2009 11:40 (UTC)
UKIP's position on EU is unchanged
Dear Mr Leg-Iron

Can you please say where you got the idea that UKIP's position has changed?

It was declared by all candidates at the leadership hustings last Saturday that our priority was to get out of the EU and stay out. If it had been otherwise the well-attended meeting would have erupted with anger, and it didn't!

Yours truly

David
[info]leg_iron wrote:
4th Nov, 2009 13:59 (UTC)
Re: UKIP's position on EU is unchanged
I answered another comment on this here:

http://leg-iron.livejournal.com/249077.html?thread=1333493#t1333493

As before, I'm no political expert and always willing to be corrected when I get something wrong.
[info]QM [blogspot.com] wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 09:48 (UTC)
You're right in one sense, however the vast majority of immigrants came not to Britain but to England. The Celtic (and Labour voting) fringe were more or less left alone leaving a legacy of racial tension in the one country that was naturally Conservative. This policy was malice aforethought deliberately designed to wreck the voting undercurrents of one nation to make it more Labour friendly.
Well the deeds done and it turns out the people invited in don't like Labour all that much either, seems they tend to like religious extremism more.
Still you've got to laugh eh?...................
[info]leg_iron wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 22:34 (UTC)
Labour set up a free-for-all so they reap what they sow. Unfortunately, so does everyone else.
[info]leg_iron wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 23:14 (UTC)
The laugh will come when it dawns on Labour that they really can't afford to bribe their voters any more and can't get rid of them either.

One for the popcorn and fizzy drinks, when it comes.
[info]subrosa-blonde.blogspot.com wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 12:40 (UTC)
Completely off topic but I thought you may like to read this:

http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com/2009/11/michael-kitt-on-e-cigarette.html
[info]leg_iron wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 23:16 (UTC)
Odd that there are such moves to ban all viable non-tobacco alternatives. It's almost as if they really want us to keep smoking the real stuff at the same rate. Wouldn't have anything to do with the tax take from that, of course.
(Anonymous) wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 17:02 (UTC)
OT but on-topic re Subrosa's comment:

I've just received my e-cigarette from miniciggy.com. Maybe it just takes a bit of getting used to but I really don't like it: the 'cig' weighs a ton, you have to really drag and the taste is awful! Has anyone found an e-cig that they're happy with?

Jay
[info]leg_iron wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 23:19 (UTC)
Sounds like you have the auto battery. I bought one to try it but I much prefer the manual battery.

The standard tobacco flavour wasn't to my taste. I prefer the virgina or cigar flavours, or the coffee flavour if I'm in a weird mood. If yours has the option of buying unloaded tips, you can get any flavour you like and load them up yourself.

I have this one:
http://theelectroniccigarette.co.uk/shop/Default.asp?shop=titan&item_name=Titan_-_Black

They all weigh much more than the real thing though. It's down to personal preference, in the end.

(Anonymous) wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 17:39 (UTC)
Jay

Try this - it aint bad. I've got the kit. Gives my lungs (what's left of them after 44 years smoking) a good hit.

http://www.smartcigarette.info/

Morg

(Anonymous) wrote:
3rd Nov, 2009 18:06 (UTC)
Thanks, Morg

Jay
(Anonymous) wrote:
4th Nov, 2009 11:48 (UTC)
Onward and upward on immigration...
The Master Plan rolls ever onward:

Mr Johnson has effectively declared that there are sufficient immigrants in this country for the Ruling Elite to afford to 'crack-down' on immigration and admit to 'past mistakes', allowing everyone in the country to give a huge sigh of relief...

Meanwhile, the main port of entry has switched from Heathrow to the birth canal.

But hey, they are all British, even though they all live in colonies which reflect Little versions of Home.
[info]leg_iron wrote:
4th Nov, 2009 14:08 (UTC)
Re: Onward and upward on immigration...
They are British if they integrate and become British. It's not asking all that much.

Those who want to make this country into something else are not British, and not immigrants. They are Labour-controlled useful idiots, they just don't know it yet. They have been imported and supported to cause unrest and let the government get more restrictive.

Once they have served their purpose, they might find their preferential treatment starts to wane.
(Anonymous) wrote:
4th Nov, 2009 11:51 (UTC)
An immigrant is not for life...

An immigrant is forever.
( 18 comments — Leave a comment )