Home

Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Enforcement by wire.

  • 4th Jan, 2009 at 2:15 AM
legiron2

If someone sends you an Email with an attached virus designed to hack into your computer and send information to a remote computer, that's illegal.

If someone breaks into your home and installs a keystroke logger into your keyboard, that's illegal.

If someone parks outside your home and hacks in to your wireless network, that's illegal.

Unless it's the police doing it. Then it's all okay.

Nothing to worry about. It's regulated by RIPA so it'll never be abused. Okay, you can laugh now. When you've finished, strengthen your firewall, replace your wireless network with a wired one and get a second USB keyboard - which you take from its hiding place, plug in and use instead of the one that's permanently connected to your computer.

But we're not a police state. Oooooh, no.
wordpress blog stats

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous) wrote:
4th Jan, 2009 15:41 (UTC)
Attention, Big Brother
We shall not be moved!

Will be adding your comments to my blog - www.thelabourparty.org.

I also intend doing bigger and better things on the internet in '09.

Interesting comments left under the Times article.

BTW, I've got your cold now and missed out on a nice day out. Still - it's back to work tomorrow, hopefully.
(Anonymous) wrote:
4th Jan, 2009 22:17 (UTC)
think of the kiddies
I see that the requisite justification word "paedophiles" is present and correct in an attempt to forstall any debate on the subject.
(Anonymous) wrote:
5th Jan, 2009 19:25 (UTC)
Surely this means that anyone who is prosecuted for anything illegal held on a PC that is linked to the internet (such as child porn or terrorist planning etc etc) can now claim they knew nothing about it and it must have been planted remotely by person(s) unknown?

Just as I believe digital photos are not admissable in court because they can be tampered with, the same must apply to hard drives if they can be accessed remotely without the owners knowledge or consent.
[info]leg_iron wrote:
5th Jan, 2009 23:21 (UTC)
Interesting point. Whatever the police can do, criminals can do. The criminals are usually better funded and more motivated too. So it the government installs backdoors on everyone's computers, they won't be exclusively used by police.

It'll be interesting to see a test case - information obtained without warrant, which could so easily have been planted. A decent lawyer should be able to rip that to shreds.

Unless they don't bother with all that 'innocent until proven guilty' stuff. Which, increasingly, it seems they won't.
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )